Monday, June 18, 2007

Secular America

In the recent issue of the Atlantic Ross Douthat writes (subscription required) about the rising force of secularism in American:
In the United States, the Bush era has summoned up—arguably for the first time in this country’s history—a mass secularism that looks to Europe and sees a model for America to follow...

America’s secular turn actually began in the 1990s, though it wasn’t until 2002 that two Berkeley sociologists first noticed it. In a paper in the American Sociological Review, Michael Hout and Claude S. Fischer announced the startling fact that the percentage of Americans who said they had “no religious preference” had doubled in less than 10 years, rising from 7 percent to 14 percent of the population. This unexpected spike wasn’t the result of growing atheism, Hout and Fischer argued; rather, more Americans were distancing themselves from organized religion as “a symbolic statement” against the religious right. If the association of religiosity with political conservatism continued to gain strength, the sociologists suggested, “then liberals’ alienation from organized religion [might] become, as it has in many other nations, institutionalized.”

Five years later, that institutionalization seems to be proceeding. It’s showing up in an increasingly secularized younger generation: A recent Pew Research Center survey found that 20 percent of 18-to-25-year-olds reported no religious affiliation, up from just 11 percent in the late 1980s. It’s visible on the best-seller lists, where books such as Kevin Phillips’s American Theocracy make their pitches to liberal readers, and in the public comments of scientists who now seem eager to attack religion as a threat rather than dismiss it as a nuisance. And it’s found a home in the expanding world of the liberal blogosphere, which has provided a virtual parish for Americans united by their disdain for “godbags” and “fundies.” (A Pew study of Howard Dean activists, one of the first mass constituencies mobilized by “netroots” activism, found that 38 percent described themselves as “secular.”)

It’s even making a difference at the ballot box. Liberals have spent much of the past six years straining to cut into the GOP’s advantage among religious voters. But when the Democrats finally shattered the Republican majority in the 2006 midterms, it was their consolidation of the secular vote that helped put them over the top. Despite all their efforts to close the God gap, the Democrats managed barely any gains among frequent churchgoers last November—but their share of the vote among Americans who never attend church at all leaped to 67 percent, from 55 percent in 2002.

This isn’t the first secular moment in American history; indeed, the modern religious right emerged, in part, as a reaction to what was perceived as the growing Godlessness of America’s political institutions, from the Supreme Court’s decision banning school prayer to the disproportionate influence of secular voters in the Democratic Party of the 1970s. But that earlier secularism tended to be an elite phenomenon: Even Time magazine’s famous 1966 cover story, “Is God Dead?,” confined its analysis to the world of intellectuals, and noted that in America, “public faith in God seems to be as secure as it was in medieval France.” The secularism that has come of age in the Bush era, by contrast, seems to have a greater mass appeal. What’s more, where the earlier secularism tended to cultivate a self-conscious neutrality toward religion, the new secularism is defined by an unabashed hostility toward traditional faith—or at least toward any attempt to mix such faith with politics. The more-extreme secular voices regard religion as a virus or a poison; more-nuanced polemicists merely argue that their religious opponents are un-American, and that faith-based politics is a stalking horse for theocracy.

Europe, on the other hand, thanks to a growing population of Muslim and Christian immigrants is slowly becoming more religious.

Should we mourn or celebrate the growing numbers of secular Americans? We can mourn the damage done to Christianity and the name of Jesus by the religious right. The religious right sold its soul to the interests of corporate American and right-wing politics and adopted an agenda that harmed American families, ignored individual liberties and dignity, and brought war, poverty, and destruction on much of the world. And did I mention their assault on science and thinking? It is no surprise there is a backlash. It is just sad that they have so sullied the name of Christianity.

But we can celebrate the growing triumph of reason and thinking and it is our task to remind people that it is possible to be a secular humanist and a follower of Jesus. There is plenty of room in the tent of progressive Christianity for all of us.

4 comments:

Anonymous said...

"But we can celebrate the growing triumph of reason and thinking and it is our task to remind people that it is possible to be a secular humanist and a follower of Jesus. There is plenty of room in the tent of progressive Christianity for all of us."

You are so very wrong on so many levels(not just this post). You have "progressed" beyond Christianity. I am sorry for you. However, you have heard the gospel message and only you are responsible for what you do with it. Unfortunatly, as a spiritual leader and teacher, you will be held to an even greater level of responsibility when you come before Christ. I am "shaking the dust off my cloak" and erasing my link to your blog. Good luck with changing the nature of God and His Word, because it ain't gonna work.

goodbye,
-dave-

liberal pastor said...

Bye, Dave, thanks for your occasional posts.

Anonymous said...

I have to strongly disagree with your comment on Europe. Yes Islam is growing, but Christianity is in a very rapid decline and (No Religion) is growing very fast, seriously just look at the numbers man! Church attendance is in the single digits in some countries and the pope is blabbering ever other month about the growing secular movement.

Secularism is growing in the USA, but certainly not as fast as it is in Europe.

Also while secularism is on the rise the far right christian extremists are growing rapidly as well. What we are seeing is the gradual diluting of the center.

Anonymous said...

Furthermore I wouldn't be so sure the GOP is getting knocked out in 2008 just yet, Rudy is polling very strong and while he may be anti abortion he is still nevertheless a very far right authoritarian and if he gets in office I think we will see something far more frightening then Bush.

The GOP while weak right now still has a very strong hand as they are perceived to handle terrorism better and if some large attack happens before the election you can be certain the GOP will win.

Even if nothing happens with the apparent certain nomination for Hillary (unless Gore steps in) isn't the best candidate with very low likability ratings.

Or how about the war?

A Democratic winner right?

Maybe not!

If the GOP submits and we start to withdraw there goes the Democrats greatest strength putting terrorism to the top of the list equaling a GOP win.

Basically it all hinges on Iraq in my opinion. If the GOP gives in now they will win in 08, if they don't they will loose, but then that leaves out the more likely of the two, neither will happen, but there will be a compromise.

So the question becomes will the compromise maintain Iraq as the top issue come the election and to what extent. The less important Iraq becomes the more likely the GOP will win unless Rudy is the nominee and some third party anti abortion guy runs and ruins it for him.

It will be very interesting to see.