Goldsmith has a new book out about his time in the White House, The Terror Presidency. He recently spoke with Jeffrey Rosen of the New York Times. Goldsmith's most insightful comment concerns the way, in his view, the President has weakened the power of the Presidency by relying on secret legal decisions to prosecute his war on terror instead of using the political power of the presidency to persuade and find allies in Congress and with the public. Goldsmith notes that his favorite war-time Presidents Lincoln and FDR were both lawyers who stretched the law during war-time but used their massive political skills to create a broad-base of support for their policies. Bush showed none of their political skills:
The Bush administration’s legalistic “go-it-alone approach,” Goldsmith suggests, is the antithesis of Lincoln and Roosevelt’s willingness to collaborate with Congress. Bush, he argues, ignored the truism that presidential power is the power to persuade. “The Bush administration has operated on an entirely different concept of power that relies on minimal deliberation, unilateral action and legalistic defense,” Goldsmith concludes in his book. “This approach largely eschews politics: the need to explain, to justify, to convince, to get people on board, to compromise.”There are those who say that Bush has these skills and that he used them as Governor of Texas to lead in a bipartisan way. But never once in seven years as President have these skills been in evidence. And it is important to remember that it hasn't mattered whether Congress was controlled by Republicans or Democrats.
No comments:
Post a Comment