Wednesday, August 01, 2007

On Tap in Your Own Homes!

Cities spend considerable tax dollars assuring us that our drinking water is not only safe, but of excellent purity. Yet millions tote around clear petroleum-produced plastic bottles of water "harvested" from other exotic locations around the state/country/globe.

When the bottled water craze started in the 1990s, I shuddered. I'd spent a considerable amount of time in 6th grade learning about how those plastic bottles are made and disposed of (or not). All that bottled water shipped around the region/state/country/world looked just like it was--an ultimate waste of natural resources in quest for another natural resource that was readily available locally.

Disney has even tried to somewhat subtly educate youngsters about the effects of drinking liquids from plastic or aluminum containers bound together by plastic rings. In the recent movie Happy Feet the penguin character with Robin William's voice has a 6-pack ring permanently stuck around his neck and is choking him.

Yet we continue to buy, refrigerate, and guzzle that bottled water in plastic containers by the millions. I hope that this New York Times editorial today will change at least a few minds.

_____________________________________

In Praise of Tap Water
Published: August 1, 2007

On the streets of New York or Denver or San Mateo this summer, it seems the telltale cap of a water bottle is sticking out of every other satchel. Americans are increasingly thirsty for what is billed as the healthiest, and often most expensive, water on the grocery shelf. But this country has some of the best public water supplies in the world. Instead of consuming four billion gallons of water a year in individual-sized bottles, we need to start thinking about what all those bottles are doing to the planet’s health.

Here are the hard, dry facts: Yes, drinking water is a good thing, far better than buying soft drinks, or liquid candy, as nutritionists like to call it. And almost all municipal water in America is so good that nobody needs to import a single bottle from Italy or France or the Fiji Islands. Meanwhile, if you choose to get your recommended eight glasses a day from bottled water, you could spend up to $1,400 annually. The same amount of tap water would cost about 49 cents.

Next, there’s the environment. Water bottles, like other containers, are made from natural gas and petroleum. The Earth Policy Institute in Washington has estimated that it takes about 1.5 million barrels of oil to make the water bottles Americans use each year. That could fuel 100,000 cars a year instead. And, only about 23 percent of those bottles are recycled, in part because water bottles are often not included in local redemption plans that accept beer and soda cans. Add in the substantial amount of fuel used in transporting water, which is extremely heavy, and the impact on the environment is anything but refreshing.

Tap water may now be the equal of bottled water, but that could change. The more the wealthy opt out of drinking tap water, the less political support there will be for investing in maintaining America’s public water supply. That would be a serious loss. Access to cheap, clean water is basic to the nation’s health.

Some local governments have begun to fight back. Earlier this summer, San Francisco Mayor Gavin Newsom prohibited his city’s departments and agencies from buying bottled water, noting that San Francisco water is “some of the most pristine on the planet.” Salt Lake City has issued a similar decree, and New York City recently began an advertising campaign that touted its water as “clean,” “zero sugar” and even “stain free.”

The real change, though, will come when millions of ordinary consumers realize that they can save money, and save the planet, by turning in their water bottles and turning on the tap.

1 comment:

Daddy Ian and Daddy Nick said...

Thanks for highlighting this editorial. Unfortunately they got the oil barrel statistic wrong. By a factor of 10. In 2006, more than 18 million barrels of oil equivalent (not 1.5 million) were used to make those bottles. That's enough oil to power one million cars! The Times' thesis holds, of course.

We'll be publishing the corrected stat at www.pacinst.org later this afternoon.